CCH&A was back in court this morning before Judge Marano. The Judge adjourned the matter to February 22, 2017 for oral argument. As a result of the adjournment, the TRO will still be in place until a decision is made by the Court.
Yesterday, Nassau County Supreme Court Justice Thomas Adams signed our Temporary Restraining Order preventing the County from enforcing “monetary penalties and tax liens in any manner whatsoever” pursuant to Nassau County’s ASIE law. This is the 3rd TRO that we have successfully obtained against the County in our pursuit for justice on the County’s egregious ASIE penalties.
We are back in Court on February 8, 2016 for oral argument on the constitutionality on the implementation and enforcement of the ASIE.
Judge orders halt to Nassau fines on county businesses
A state court judge on Monday halted the collection of hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines imposed on Nassau businesses by the county assessor last month. Read the entire Newsday article here.
Owners of commercial property in Nassau are finding some substantial spikes in the tax bills they’re getting this month, sharply raising the tax burdens – and blood pressure – of the county’s more than 23,000 commercial property owners and thousands of their small business tenants…
Read the entire article here
Nassau County has implemented the Disputed Assessment Fund (“DAF”) as evidenced in your 2016/17 School tax bill and the 2017 General Tax bill. The 2016/17 School tax bills show that between 10%-20% of the total school taxes were subtracted from the bill for the “Disputed Assessment Fund School.” In essence, your 2016/17 School tax bills were less 10%-20%.
Upon receipt of your 2017 General Tax bill, you noticed that 10%-20% of your General taxes were credited from your General tax bill for “Disputed Assessment Fund General.” However, your General tax bill was not 10-20% less, but rather the 10%-20% allocated for DAF School and DAF General had been added to General tax bill, making it higher than expected.
DAF was created by Nassau County in an effort to have taxpayers, in essence, fund their own tax refunds resulting from obtaining a reduction in assessment. In theory, the taxpayer is not paying “extra” for DAF, but rather, the County is taking 10%-20% off the School & General bills and allocating that amount into an escrow account designated for tax refunds. In turn, the County, Town and School Districts are receiving 10%-20% less in taxes.
In light of this potential loss of revenue to the County, Town and School Districts, they have significantly increased their tax rates to recover the difference. Tax rates have increased as much as 30% in some districts. This accounts for the drastic increase in taxes this year.
Our firm is reviewing the constitutionality of the enactment and administration of DAF and will be proceeding accordingly on behalf of our clients. In the interim, we strongly advise you and your tenants to contact your local legislators to voice your opinions on DAF, as well as the ASIE penalties. The more voices that are heard, the more inclined they will be to do something about it.